What should a buyer receive as a refund for non-completion of the project within the completion date?

When considering what a buyer should receive as a refund for non-completion of a project within the specified completion date, the logical approach is that the buyer is entitled to the total amount they have paid. This is because the essence of contract law is that when one party fails to fulfill their obligations, the other party is entitled to a remedy that restores them to the position they would have been in had the contract been performed as agreed.

In this context, since the project has not been completed by the agreed-upon deadline, the buyer has not received the service or value they were promised. Therefore, the total amount paid serves as a fair restitution for the lack of fulfillment of the contract. This concept aligns with the principles of equity and fairness in contract disputes, ensuring that the buyer is not unduly penalized for the seller's failure to meet contractual obligations.

Other options, such as offering partial payments or future service credits, do not fully compensate the buyer for the non-completion of the project. Partial payments would only reimburse a portion of the total investment, which may not reflect the full extent of loss incurred by the buyer. Future service credits do not provide immediate financial restitution and depend on the seller's future performance, which is uncertain. As such,